Qwen3.8 Flash
No extra published tiers, cache components, Batch rates, or time-based rates are listed.
Compare verified published API prices for Qwen3.8 Flash and GPT-6 Luna. This page compares price, not output quality.
Verified Oct 28, 2026, Qwen3.8 Flash lists input at $0.15 and output at $0.47 per 1M tokens, while GPT-6 Luna lists $0.10 input and $0.50 output. GPT-6 Luna is 33.3% cheaper for input, while Qwen3.8 Flash is 6% cheaper for output; costs meet at 0.6 input tokens per output token, and this does not compare output quality.
| Model | Input $/1M | Cached input $/1M | Output $/1M | Source | Last verified How we verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash | $0.15 | $0.016 | $0.47 | Official source | Oct 28, 2026 |
| GPT-6 Luna | $0.10 | $0.01 | $0.50 | Official source | Oct 21, 2026 |
Prices from official provider pages, verified on the date shown.
Published rates
| Field | Qwen3.8 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Input / 1M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.016 | $0.01 |
| Output / 1M | $0.47 | $0.50 |
| Batch input / 1M | Not listed | $0.05 |
| Batch output / 1M | Not listed | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 1050K |
| Release date | Not listed | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Official source How we verify | Alibaba pricing ↗ | OpenAI pricing ↗ |
Standard token prices
Costs below allocate 1M total tokens across each input:output ratio. They use standard prices only, without cache or Batch discounts.
| Input:output ratio | Qwen3.8 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Cheaper published price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10:1 (RAG / long context) | $0.179 | $0.136 | GPT-6 Luna by 23.9% |
| 3:1 (chat) | $0.23 | $0.20 | GPT-6 Luna by 13% |
| 1:1 | $0.31 | $0.30 | GPT-6 Luna by 3.2% |
| 1:3 (long generation) | $0.39 | $0.40 | Qwen3.8 Flash by 2.5% |
The standard prices break even at exactly 0.6 input tokens per output token. On either side of that mix, the model with the lower weighted list price changes.
Computed examples
| Workload | Assumed volume | Qwen3.8 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Side project | 10,000 requests/month | $2.61 | $2.30 | GPT-6 Luna by $0.31 (11.9%) |
| Customer support chatbot | 10,000 conversations/month | $23.32 | $17.57 | GPT-6 Luna by $5.76 (24.7%) |
| Agent task | 1,000 tasks/month | $3.30 | $2.80 | GPT-6 Luna by $0.504 (15.3%) |
Provider conditions
No extra published tiers, cache components, Batch rates, or time-based rates are listed.
| Tier | Input | Cached input | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long context | $0.20 | $0.02 | $0.75 |
| Short context | $0.10 | $0.01 | $0.50 |
Batch API: input $0.05 and output $0.25 per 1M tokens.
Verified changes
First observed on Oct 28, 2026; Alibaba Qwen did not publish an effective date. Alibaba Qwen added Qwen3.8 Flash with published input $0.15 and output $0.47 per 1M tokens.
View this update in the price monitorOn Sep 22, 2026, OpenAI replaced GPT-5.6 Luna with GPT-6 Luna: input $0.20 → $0.10 (−50%) and output $1.20 → $0.50 (−58.3%) per 1M tokens.
View this update in the price monitorOperational costs
Retries, failed calls, fallback requests, and longer outputs can raise the cost of completing a task even when the published token price is lower. Model the effect with the LLM Retry & Fallback Cost Calculator, read the cost-per-successful-task guide, or estimate a migration with the Model Switch Cost Calculator.
Primary evidence and next steps
Common questions
GPT-6 Luna is 33.3% cheaper on input. Qwen3.8 Flash is 6% cheaper on output. This compares published list prices, not output quality.
At 800 input and 300 output tokens per request, Qwen3.8 Flash costs about $2.61 and GPT-6 Luna costs about $2.30 at standard list prices.
At a 10:1 input-to-output token ratio, Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.179 and GPT-6 Luna costs $0.136 per 1M total tokens. GPT-6 Luna by 23.9%.
The prices come from Alibaba and OpenAI official pricing sources, verified on Oct 28, 2026 and Oct 21, 2026, respectively.
See the pricing verification methodology and AI API pricing dataset.